Solar Rights
California law protects the right to own and operate a solar
system for a home or business. This means that no one person or entity (such as
a neighborhood association or local government) can, within reason, prohibit a
property owner from investing in solar power. It also means that one property
owner can not encumber another’s access to the sun.
The first policy establishing
rights for solar power system owners was the Warren-Alquist Act (Solar Shade
Control Act, Public
Resources Code Section 25980-25986), which states:
"...It
is the policy of the state to promote all feasible means of energy conservation
and all feasible uses of alternative energy supply sources. In particular, the
state encourages the planting and maintenance of trees and shrubs to create
shading, moderate outdoor temperatures, and provide various economic and
aesthetic benefits. However, there are certain situations in which the need for
widespread use of alternative energy devices, such as solar collectors,
requires specific and limited controls on trees and shrubs."
The law goes on to state that
no person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed, or, if placed, to grow
subsequent to the installation of a solar collector on the property of another
so as to cast a shadow greater than 10 percent of solar collector area.
Further, Civil
Code 801.5 establishes the right of property owners to “receive sunlight,”
referred to as a “solar easement.”
In addition, Government
Code 65850.5, states that it is the “policy of the state to promote
and encourage the use of solar energy systems and to limit obstacles to their
use” and that the timely and cost-effective installation of solar power is not
a municipal affair but rather a matter of statewide concern. This statute goes
on to prohibit local agencies from adopting “ordinances that create
unreasonable barriers to the installation of solar energy systems, including,
but not limited to, design review for aesthetic purposes, and not unreasonably
restrict the ability of homeowners and agricultural and business concerns to
install solar energy systems.”
In an attempt to further
clarify legislative intent, the statue requires that local agencies comply with
the legislature’s “intent to encourage the installation of solar energy systems
by removing obstacles to, and minimizing costs of, permitting for such
systems.”
Lastly, Civil
Code 714 prohibits any covenant, restriction, deed, contract, or security
instrument from effectively prohibiting or restricting the installation or use
of a solar energy system. Any such document found to do so shall be rendered
void and unenforceable.
State law clarifies that,
reasonable restrictions withstanding, “it is the policy of the state to promote
and encourage the use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles
thereto.” Reasonable restrictions are defined as those that do not significantly
increase the cost of the system (defined as not exceeding $2,000) or
significantly decrease its efficiency or specified performance (defined as
cutting efficiency by 20%). The law also requires that all solar applications
be approved in the same manner as any other architectural modification and not
“willfully avoided or delayed”. The law does allow systems installed on
common areas to be restricted.
Unfortunately, even with the
clear language protecting consumer rights to solar power, there are a number if
situations in which a neighborhood association or local government will still
try to get around these laws in order to prevent a solar power installation.
The reasons for this kind of activity differ from one to the other but often
stem from concerns over property value or aesthetics.
For example, some cities
prohibit any solar system from being visible from the street. If a home faces
south, it maybe impossible to install a system that is not visible from the
street. Others require unreasonably high permitting fees that make the
investment cost-prohibitive. While for
others, a $2,000 fee for installation is enough of a financial burden to
prohibit their investment in solar power.
Ultimately, all consumers
should be aware of their rights first and foremost. If unreasonable
restrictions are encountered, we encourage the use of education, information
and community support as the first response. Often, a little information or
public spotlight on the situation goes a long way toward a favorable
resolution.
For more detailed analysis of California’s solar rights laws, visit The
Energy Policy Initiatives Center at the University of San Diego School of Law
at http://www.sandiego.edu/epic/.
|