logo

Clean Water News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2006-07-07
For More Information:
Contact Dan Jacobson
(916) 446-8062 x 105

New Study Finds 57 Pesticides Linked to Harmful Health Effects in San Joaquin River system

 

A new Environment California Research & Policy report released today reveals the presence of 57 pesticides in the waters and soils of the San Joaquin River system.  The vast majority of these chemicals are linked to a host of health threats that range from cancer to brain damage. 

The report, entitled Reviving the San Joaquin: How California’s Water Boards Can Restore a Signature California Waterway to Health, is the first public analysis of the results of a recent agricultural pesticide pollution testing program conducted by scientists at the University of California, Davis.

“Agricultural pesticides have no place in one of California’s most important sources of drinking water,” stated Sujatha Jahagirdar, author of the report and Clean Water Advocate for Environment California Research & Policy Center.

The report also found pesticide pollution at 100 percent of all San Joaquin system sites sampled.  At 48 percent of these sites, levels of pesticides exceed environmental or public health standards maintained by the Central Valley Water Board.

To restore the San Joaquin River to health, Reviving the San Joaquin recommends that the Central Valley Regional Water Board and State Water Board adopt several regulations to stop new pollution from entering the waterway, clean up existing contamination, ensure sufficient flows and restore essential habitat.

To stop more pesticide pollution and other agricultural contaminants from entering the San Joaquin River, the report recommends that the Central Valley Water Board and State Water Board require individual agricultural operations to comply with strong clean water permits that will eliminate harmful agricultural pollution entering the San Joaquin River within ten years. 

In addition, the boards should impose strict mandatory penalties on any operations that fail to comply with pollution reduction requirements; require extensive neutral third-party monitoring to identify sources of contamination and charge adequate fees to agricultural operations that allow the boards to properly oversee pollution reduction efforts.