|
Clean Water Program Reports
Executive Summary
The importance of California's water supply is immeasurable. From quenching thirsty cities to supporting fragile ecosystems to making food grow, each drop of water in California is precious. Recent developments sharply underscore this importance. On January 1st , after years of failed negotiations between water purveyors, the U.S. Department of the Interior cut California's Colorado River water supply by half.1 As the Colorado River is the single largest water source for Southern California,2 this reduction adds enormous uncertainty to the state's water future. The Colorado River reduction highlights the importance of ensuring that California's existing and potential water supplies are thoroughly protected. Despite this importance, however, careless practices pollute billions of gallons of underground drinking water supplies each year. Down the Drain profiles six cases of groundwater contamination in California and their impact on the state's water supplies. New analysis of data provided by water officials finds that in these six cases alone, 70 billion gallons of otherwise potable water supplies are too polluted to drink. Were these water supplies available for consumption, the volume could compensate for 35% of the water just cut from the Colorado River and support 400,000 families for a year.3 Because California's water supply is a finite, this loss also increased local, regional and statewide pressures on water supply. If this contamination continues, communities across the state may eventually run out of alternative supplies to turn to. Profile Summaries:
Santa Monica and MTBE
The San Gabriel Valley
and Perchlorate Fresno and Nitrates The Inland Empire and
Perchlorate San Diego and MTBE Rancho Cordova and Perchlorate
Table 1. Summary of Findings
*Equal to 35% of the recent water reduction to California from the Colorado River 1 Policy Recommendations:If we are to succeed in ensuring California's water future, it is essential to protect our water supplies from costly and health-threatening contamination. To prevent contamination of California's precious underground water supplies, we recommend the following: 1. Reduce the use of contaminants that threaten our drinking water sources; 2. Increase public access to information about pollution threats; 3. Require full payment of cleanup costs and replacement of lost water supplies by entities that cause contamination; 4. Increase citizen participation in pollution prevention; 5. Fully enforce discharge permits to surface water; 6. Establish protective zones around drinking water wells; 7. Increase the monitoring of underground drinking water sources for contamination; and 8. Require permits for all discharges into California water bodies, including agricultural runoff. Notes1. US Department of the Interior, Press Release ‘Inte-rior Department Transmits 2003 Water Order Approv-als to Colorado River Users.’ 27 December 2002 2. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Report on Metropolitan’s Water Supplies, 11 February 2002 3. Tony Perry, ‘Southland Share of Water to Be Cut as Deal Collapses’ The Los Angeles Times 1 Jan 2003 One acre-foot is approximately enough to supply two families with sufficient water from the year 4. California Department of Health Services, MTBE Occurrence Database, Last Updated 7 January 2003 5. Nancy Vogel, ‘Tough Rule Urged for Gas Additive in Drinking Water,’ Sacramento Bee, 9 May 1998 6. City production levels provided by Charmaine Bao, Water Supply Engineer, City of Santa Monica, 9 January 2002. In 1990, the City of Santa Monica produced 1.625 billion gallons from local groundwater sources. In 1995, the city produced 3.270 billion gallons 7. One acre-foot is enough to supply two families with water for a year 8. U.S. EPA Region 9, ‘Unilateral Administrative Or-der for Water Replacement, Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil Products Company, Equilon Enterprises LLCI, U.S. (docket no. RCRA 7003-09-99-0007), 10 March 2000 9. valleynet.org, ‘The Economic Partnership,’ down-loaded 17 January 2002 10. epa.gov/superfund, ‘U.S. EPA,’ downloaded 13 January 2002 11. Number of disabled wells and capacity provided by Kevin Smead, Engineer, Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster 12. ‘U.S. EPA,’ downloaded 13 January 2002 13. epa.gov, ‘U.S. EPA,’ Consumer Factsheet on: Nitrates/ Nitrites, downloaded 12 January 2003 14. Well capacities and closure numbers provided by Douglas Kirk, City of Fresno, 20 January 2002 15. Ibid. 16. Pablo Lopez, ‘Fresno to Restore Four Wells,’ The Fresno Bee, 5 June 2002 17. Well capacities and closure numbers provided by Leon Long, Assistant General Manager, West San Bernardino Municipal Water District 18. Andrew Silva, ‘Our Troubled water,’ San Bernardino County Sun, 14 December 2002 19. Andrew Silva, ‘Water Board Spares Companies from Cleaning Order,’ 13 September 2002 20. Kelly Dorsey, Engineering Geologist, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, Clean Water Task Force Presentation, 5 December 2002 21. Letter to Mayor, City of San Diego from John H. Robertus, Executive Officer, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, 15 November 2002 22. Volumes of treated water discharged provided by Cheryl, Engineer, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, 10 January 2003 23. populations.com, ‘The World News Network,’ downloaded 21 January 2003 24. Number of disabled wells, well capacities provided by Alex MacDonald, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, 13 January 2003
|